Design and Feel
Feel of the Glock 19
The first encounter with a handgun often begins with its feel in the hand. The Glock 19, a stalwart of the firearms world, presents a design philosophy rooted in simplicity and practicality. Its polymer frame, a hallmark of Glock’s innovation, is instantly recognizable. The shape is somewhat blocky, but undeniably functional. The original Glock 19 grip texture might be described as utilitarian – textured enough to provide purchase but not overly aggressive. This straightforward approach has garnered both praise and criticism. The absence of elaborate contours makes the Glock 19 easy to conceal, and its design philosophy often emphasizes operational reliability above all else. It is a handgun that is meant to work in a variety of conditions and with minimal fuss. While the grip may seem relatively basic to some, the Glock 19’s widespread adoption speaks volumes about its ergonomic functionality. The grip angle, although a frequent point of debate, is easily mastered with practice.
Feel of the M&P 2.0
Now, let’s look at the Smith & Wesson M&P 2.0, which builds upon the foundation of its predecessor. The designers at Smith & Wesson clearly listened to feedback, as the 2.0 presents a more refined and user-centric design. The first noticeable difference is the enhanced grip texture. It’s markedly more aggressive than the Glock 19, offering a more secure hold, particularly in wet or challenging conditions. This enhanced grip texture has been a popular upgrade for many. A truly brilliant feature of the M&P 2.0 is its modularity. Four interchangeable palm swell inserts are included with the handgun, allowing shooters to tailor the grip size to their individual hand dimensions. This adjustability ensures a comfortable and confident hold for a wider range of users. The M&P 2.0’s grip contours are also more pronounced, enhancing the overall ergonomics.
Comparison of Grips
When comparing these two, the choice of which feels better in hand is ultimately subjective. The Glock 19 is a classic, a proven workhorse with an undeniably functional grip. The M&P 2.0, however, takes a more modern approach, offering a grip that some will find more comfortable and secure. The interchangeable palm swells make it easier for more individuals to achieve a perfect fit. It’s essential to handle both handguns to determine which feels the most natural and provides the best shooting platform for your unique hand size and shape.
The Trigger Experience
Glock 19 Trigger
The trigger is the vital link between the shooter’s intent and the bullet’s trajectory. In the Glock 19, the trigger mechanism is a key component of the overall system, and a significant aspect of its appeal. This “Safe Action” trigger is a key element of the gun’s popularity. The Glock trigger is characterized by a relatively consistent pull weight and a tactile reset. The initial take-up is the slack that must be taken up before engaging the fire control. The break is the point where the sear releases and the gun fires. The reset is the distance the trigger must be released before the gun is ready to fire again. Many shooters appreciate this predictable feel and the simplicity of the design. Many people find the simplicity of the Glock 19’s trigger an advantage, as the relatively short travel and clean break promotes consistent shooting. While not winning any awards for finesse, it is a functional and reliable trigger.
M&P 2.0 Trigger
Moving on to the Smith & Wesson M&P 2.0, the company made improvements to the trigger. The trigger of the 2.0 features a more refined feel than the original M&P. The trigger has a crisper break, offering shooters a cleaner and more defined release. The reset, the distance the trigger needs to travel forward, is also noticeably shorter, allowing for faster follow-up shots. This allows for more precise and controlled shooting. These enhancements make the M&P 2.0 trigger a pleasure to shoot for many. Many experienced shooters find the 2.0 trigger to be a great choice.
Trigger Comparison
In the comparison of these two triggers, the M&P 2.0 frequently gets the nod for a better out-of-the-box experience. Its shorter reset and crisper break tend to be favored by many shooters. However, both triggers are easily upgradable. Both offer various aftermarket options. For someone who prefers a very simple trigger, the Glock 19 will do the trick. Ultimately, the best trigger is the one that allows you to shoot the most accurately and comfortably.
Reliability and Longevity
Glock 19 Reliability
Reliability is paramount in any firearm, especially when it comes to a defensive handgun. The Glock 19 has earned an enviable reputation for its dependable performance. Glock’s design philosophy, prioritizing simplicity and durability, translates to a weapon that can withstand harsh conditions. The materials used in the frame and slide are designed for longevity, and the absence of complex mechanisms reduces the potential for malfunction. Countless anecdotes and documented instances attest to the Glock 19’s ability to function reliably in demanding environments, from desert heat to freezing temperatures. The Glock 19 is known to work after being neglected and abused. The Glock 19 is renowned for its ruggedness and ease of maintenance, which contribute to its long service life.
M&P 2.0 Reliability
The Smith & Wesson M&P 2.0, too, has been engineered for reliability. Building upon the design of the original M&P, the 2.0 incorporates several enhancements intended to increase durability and reduce potential points of failure. The frame, slides, and internal components are constructed from high-quality materials, designed to resist wear and tear. While the M&P 2.0 has not had as much time to build a track record as the Glock 19, early reports and extensive testing have shown it to be a very reliable handgun. Smith & Wesson’s reputation for producing dependable firearms bodes well for the M&P 2.0’s long-term performance.
Reliability Comparison
When comparing these handguns, both offer outstanding reliability. The Glock 19 benefits from decades of proven performance and has become a benchmark for reliability. The M&P 2.0 is a newer design, but its initial track record is very promising. Ultimately, both the Glock 19 and the M&P 2.0 are more than capable of performing in any situation, and both can be trusted. Regular maintenance, as with any firearm, is vital to keeping any gun running reliably.
Accuracy and Performance on the Range
Glock 19 Accuracy
Accuracy is a combination of the shooter’s skill and the inherent capabilities of the firearm. The Glock 19, with its fixed barrel and reliable trigger, is capable of excellent accuracy. The sights, typically Glock’s standard sights, are serviceable, although many shooters opt for aftermarket options. The Glock 19’s lightweight polymer frame contributes to reduced recoil, making it easier to control during rapid fire. Experienced shooters can consistently achieve tight groupings at typical defensive distances. With practice, the Glock 19 is a highly accurate handgun. The straight forward design also helps with accuracy.
M&P 2.0 Accuracy
The Smith & Wesson M&P 2.0 also offers excellent potential for accuracy. The improved trigger, with its crisper break and shorter reset, can make it easier for shooters to maintain a consistent sight picture and achieve tighter groups. The grip angle, along with the included grip inserts, can aid in natural pointability, which contributes to accuracy. The M&P 2.0 often comes with enhanced sights, which are better in low-light conditions.
Accuracy Comparison
Comparing the Glock 19 and M&P 2.0 in this area, accuracy often comes down to the shooter’s proficiency and personal preference. Both are more than accurate enough for defensive purposes, and both offer significant potential for precision shooting. The choice between them might come down to which platform the shooter finds easier to control and point naturally.
Features and Customization
Glock 19 Customization
The ability to personalize a handgun to one’s specific needs is a significant advantage. The Glock 19, with its widespread popularity, enjoys an unparalleled level of aftermarket support. Virtually every component of the Glock 19 can be upgraded, modified, or replaced. From sights and triggers to slides, barrels, and grip enhancements, the options are virtually limitless. This extensive availability of parts and accessories allows shooters to tailor their Glock 19 to their exact specifications. This level of customization is a significant advantage for those who prefer to fine-tune their firearms.
M&P 2.0 Customization
The Smith & Wesson M&P 2.0, although slightly younger in the market, also offers a considerable array of aftermarket customization options. Although the selection may not be as extensive as for the Glock 19, the M&P 2.0 has a very strong supporting ecosystem. The availability of sights, triggers, grip modifications, and other accessories allows shooters to customize their M&P 2.0. The M&P 2.0 offers a great balance of customization options for shooters who want to make their handgun unique.
Customization Comparison
When comparing these two handguns, both provide excellent opportunities for customization. The Glock 19 has the edge in the sheer volume of available parts, due to its longer history. The M&P 2.0, however, provides a growing collection of upgrades and accessories, and its popularity continues to grow. This is another area where the user will need to decide what is most important to them.
Price and Value Considerations
The price of a firearm is an essential factor for most buyers. Both the Glock 19 and the Smith & Wesson M&P 2.0 fall into the affordable range, and you generally get what you pay for with both guns. The Glock 19 and M&P 2.0 typically have similar MSRPs. The best value often comes down to individual features, personal needs, and overall preferences. Beyond the initial purchase price, owners need to consider the cost of ammunition, accessories, and maintenance.
Pros and Cons at a Glance
Glock 19 Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Wide availability of aftermarket parts and accessories
- Simple, intuitive design
- Proven track record
- High resale value
Cons:
- Grip texture can be less aggressive
- Trigger feel may not appeal to all shooters
- Grip angle might not suit everyone
M&P 2.0 Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Enhanced grip texture and ergonomics
- Improved trigger
- Interchangeable palm swells for customization
- Good value for the features
- Sights are better
Cons:
- Aftermarket options are less extensive than the Glock 19
- Recoil can be a bit more noticeable for some.
Conclusion: Making the Choice
Choosing between the Glock 19 and the M&P 2.0 is not a simple task, as both handguns have earned their reputations as leaders. The **Glock 19** is a legendary pistol, known for its reliability, simplicity, and widespread support. It is a solid, dependable choice that is a favorite for many experienced shooters and a perfect option for beginners. It is difficult to find a more proven handgun.
The **Smith & Wesson M&P 2.0**, on the other hand, offers a more modern take on the 9mm handgun. With its enhanced grip, improved trigger, and customizable ergonomics, it provides a refined shooting experience. The M&P 2.0 is a great choice for anyone who is looking for a modern handgun with increased comfort and control.
Ultimately, the best choice depends on your individual needs and preferences. If you prioritize legendary reliability and a vast selection of aftermarket parts, the Glock 19 is an excellent option. If you prefer a more comfortable grip, a better trigger, and a more customizable experience right out of the box, the M&P 2.0 is the superior choice. The best way to make your decision is to handle, and if possible, shoot both handguns. This hands-on experience will help you determine which feels more natural in your hand, which trigger suits your shooting style, and which handgun aligns better with your overall needs. Consider your budget, your preferred shooting style, and the intended use of the firearm. By carefully evaluating these factors, you can confidently select the handgun that will best serve your needs.
The question is not which is the best, but which is best for you.
